Pengaruh Persepsi Terhadap Perilaku Pencarian Informasi di Scopus: The Effect of Perception on Scopus Information Search Behavior. Oleh: Maryono dan Barid BW
Abstract
This research examines users perceptions on Scopus and its effects on information search behavior, which is very important related to the obligations of international publications and the high costs of submission and access which often lead to pros and cons. Perceptions use the ISO 25010 model, the information search behavior uses modified Ellis model. Perceptions of Scopus are excellent, although it is still considered too expensive. Scopus information is considered to be of high value, with sub-variables of accuracy, authenticity, and suitability. Information search behavior has not been systematic in accordance with the modified Ellis model. Mendeley’s use is very low, users are not yet accustomed to tracking citation, organise and store literature, arranging literature based on quality and novelty. H1 hypothesis accepted, there is correlation between perception and information search behavior, correlation coefficient 0,311. Increased perception will always be followed by an increase in search behavior.
Keywords: scopus, perception, information search behavior, Ellis model, ISO 25010
Abstrak
Penelitian survei ini menganalisis persepsi pengguna dan pengaruhnya terhadap perilaku pencarian informasi di Scopus, yang sangat penting dikaji, terkait adanya kewajiban publikasi internasional dan tingginya biaya submit serta akses yang sering menimbulkan pro dan kontra. Persepsi terhadap Scopus menggunakan model ISO 25010, perilaku pencarian informasi menggunakan model Ellis yang dimodifikasi. Persepsi Scopus sangat bagus, meskipun masih dianggap terlalu mahal. Informasi Scopus dianggap bernilai tinggi dengan sub variabel ketepatan dan keakuratan, keotentikan, serta kesesuaian. Perilaku pencarian informasi belum sistematis sesuai model Ellis yang dimodifikasi. Penggunaan Mendeley sangat rendah, belum terbiasa melacak sitasi, menata dan menyimpan literatur, serta menata literatur berdasar kualitas dan kebaruan. Hipotesis H1 diterima, terdapat hubungan antara persepsi dan perilaku pencarian informasi di Scopus, koefisien korelasi 0,311. Peningkatan persepsi akan selalu diikuti peningkatan perilaku.
Kata kunci: scopus, persepsi, perilaku pencarian informasi, model Ellis, ISO 25010
IPTEK-KOM, Vol. 20 No. 2, Desember 2018: 137 – 152. 1645-6514-1-PB
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Aman, Valeria. “How collaboration impacts citation flows within the German science system,” Scientometrics 109 (December 2016):2195-2216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2092-1
Chatra, Emeraldy. “Scopus dan Arah Penelitian Kita,” http://www.sumbarsatu.com/, Edisi Minggu, 28/08/2016, diakses 2 Maret 2018
Chun, Youngchoon; Yi, Jiho; Park, Jung-ran; and Choi, Sangki. “Information Behaviors of Nuclear Scientists at Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute,” Journal of East Asian Libraries 2015, No. 161, Article 6 (2015). https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/jeal/vol2015/iss161/6
Fathurrahman, Muslih. “Model-Model Perilaku Pencarian Informasi,” JIPI (Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi) I, no.1 (2016):74-91. http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/jipi/article/view/101/66, diakses 24 Agustus 2018
Hui-Zhen Fu, Jian Chu & Ming Zhang. “In-depth analysis of international collaboration and inter-institutional collaboration in nuclear science and technology during 2006–2015,” Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology 55, no.1 (2018):29-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1383209
Gaffar, Abdul. “Kanibalisasi Akademis,” Solopos.com, Edisi 11/01/2018, diakses 6 Maret 2018
Gumelar, Michael Sega. “Industri Budaya dan Kontes Prestige: Terpinggirnya Pemuatan Laporan Penelitian di Jurnal yang Tidak Terindeks Scopus di Indonesia,” Jurnal Studi Kultural II, no.1 (2017): 29-32. https://journals.an1mage.net/index.php/ajsk/article/view/75, diakses 24 Agustus 2018
Gumelar, Michael Sega. “Hegeformaslavery: OJS dan Jebakan Saling Tuding sebagai Jurnal Predator,” Jurnal Studi Kultural III, no. 1 (2018): 25–34. https://journals.an1mage.net/index.php/ajsk/article/view/55, diakses 24 Agustus 2018
Hartono, Dudi. Psikologi: modul bahan ajar cetak Keperawatan. Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 2016.
Hasan, M. Iqbal. Pokok-pokok materi metodologi penelitian & aplikasinya. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2002
Hasbullah, Moeflich. “Profesor, Scopus, dan Alternatif,” Republika.co.id, Edisi 14 September 2016. http://www.republika.co.id/, diakses 2 Maret 2018
Kaur, Har. and Preeti Mahajan. “Collaboration in medical research: a case study of India,” Scientometrics 105 (October 2015):683–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1691-6
Lind, Douglas A., William G. Marchal and Samuel A. Wathen. Statistical Techniques in Business and Economics. 15th ed. New York:McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2012
Maryono dan Surajiman. “Kolaborasi Internal, Domestik dan Internasional Serta Korelasinya Dengan Sitasi Yang Diperoleh: Analisis Publikasi UGM di Scopus,” Berkala Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, Vol. 13 no. 2, (Desember 2017). https://doi.org/10.22146/bip.27492
Meho, Lokman I. and Helen R. Tibbo. “Modeling the Information-Seeking Behavior of Social Scientists: Ellis’s Study Revisited,” Journal Of The American Society For Information Science And Technology 54, no.6 (2003):570-587. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10244
Miguel, Jose P., David Mauricio and Glen Rodríguez. “A review of software quality models for the evaluation of software products,” International Journal of Software Engineering & Application (IJSEA) 5, no. 6 (November 2014). DOI: 10.5121/ijsea.2014.5603
Nguyen, Tuan V., Thao P. Ho-Le and Ut V. Le. “International collaboration in scientific research in Vietnam: an analysis of patterns and impact,” Scientometrics 110 (February 2017):1035-1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2201-1
Norouzi, Yaghoub and Naemeh Sokhanvari. “A Study of compatibility between Iranian digital libraries user interface and the elements of Ellis model of information seeking behavior,” Journal of Information Processing and Management 29 no.4 (2014) :949-978. URL: http://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article-1-2445-en.html
O’Carroll AM, Westby EP, Dooley J, Gordon KE. “Information-Seeking Behaviors of Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey,” JMIR Medical Education 1 , no.1 (2015):e4. DOI: 10.2196/mededu.4267
Osmani, Mohammad; Rozan MZA; Bakhtyar Ali Ahmad; Ari Sabir Arif. “Reference Management Software (Rms) in an Academic Environment: A Survey at a Research University in Malaysia,” Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology 88, no.1 (June 2016):135-144. http://www.jatit.org/volumes/Vol88No1/15Vol88No1.pdf
Pieter, Herri Zan dan Namora Lumongga Lubis. Pengantar psikologi untuk kebidanan. Jakarta: Prenadamedia, 2016.
Prawira, Purwa Atmaja. Psikologi umum dengan perspektif baru. Jogjakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2014.
QS World University Rankings. “QS World University Rankings Methodology.” Accessed Agustus 7, 2018. https://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings/methodology Sevilla, Consuelo G., Jesus A. Ochave, Twila G.
Punsalan, Bella P. Regala, Gabriel B. Uriarte. Research Methods. Quezon City: Rex Printing, 2007
Siyoto. Dasar metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Literasi Media, 2015
Sooryamoorthy, Radhamany. “Do types of collaboration change citation? A scientometric analysis of social science publications in South Africa,” Scientometrics 111 (April 2017):379-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2265-6
Stevenson, Janet. Dictionary of information and library management. London: A & C Black, 2006
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2015
THE World University Rankings. “About Times Higher Education World University Rankings.” Accessed August 7, 2018. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/about-the-times-higher-education-world-university-rankings
Wang, Lei, Bart Thijs and Wolfgang Glänzel. “Characteristics of international collaboration in sport sciences publications and its influence on citation impact,” Scientometrics 105 (November 2015):843–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1735-y
Widiyastuti. “Perbandingan Teori Perilaku Pencarian Informasi Menurut Ellis, Wilson dan Kuhlthau,” Jurnal Pustaka Budaya 3, no. 2 (Juli 2016):51-64. https://ejurnal.unilak.ac.id/index.php/pb/article/view/281
Wilson, Thomas Daniel. “Human Information Behavior,” Special Issue on Information Science Research 3, no. 2 (2000):49-55. inform.nu/Articles/Vol3/v3n2p49-56.pdf, 24 Agustus 2018
Zhou, Ping and Xiaozan Lv. “Academic publishing and collaboration between China and Germany in physics,” Scientometrics 105 (December 2015):1875-1887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1643-1